A draft first-pass freedom-to-operate analysis with claim charts in 15 minutes, not days.
Legacy platforms dump thousands of raw patents on your desk and call it a search. Evalify executes that entire first pass autonomously and delivers a risk baseline in minutes. It shifts our hours away from data gathering and into high-level client advisory.
Spending days manually pulling prior art is no longer a viable model. Because Evalify handles the search execution and the contextual first pass, we now start our FTO analysis at the finish line of a traditional search. We are practicing law again instead of acting as data parsers.
Evalify is among the early-stage companies revolutionizing the Legal Tech space by streamlining processes, enhancing efficiency, and transforming the industry.
No other product turns a patent search into a drafted first pass this precise. Every claim charted element by element, every chart cross-examined by multiple agents, and the reasoning documented.
Evalify designs the search, runs it across 200M+ patents and 170+ jurisdictions, and returns a charted, cross-examined first pass in about 15 minutes.
An objective baseline with the claims charted element by element and the risk quantified. You refine or override anything. The judgment stays yours.
You start where a traditional search ends. The hours go into the analysis and the advice the client is actually paying for.
Running a client's unfiled invention through someone else's AI is the first thing that stops an attorney. Evalify has this covered.
The documents you upload, the technical disclosure, the draft claims, the product description, are not retained after the run. There is no archive of your client's disclosure sitting on a server.
The working copy of your input is destroyed once the analysis finishes. What comes back is the analysis, not your file.
Your client's invention never becomes training data. Not for Evalify, not for the models underneath it, not for anyone else.
Zero retention applies to the input material. Your analyses and reports live in your own Evalify account, so you can return to them, edit and export.
The FTO Brief and the full report. Export either one as a PDF or an editable Word file. Page through the real ones below.
The answer, short enough to read before a client call. This is the one most clients see.
Everything the Brief stands on, charted and sourced.
Every plan exports. Standard gives you the Brief as a PDF. Counsel-Grade opens the Export Composer: both documents, each as a PDF or an editable Word file.
Report length varies with the complexity of the assessment.
What separates Evalify from search portals and from asking a general-purpose model.
A reasoned infringement verdict and per-jurisdiction risk, in the form attorneys already write. A first draft you edit, not a list you interpret.
Every limitation of every charted claim mapped against the product, with the verdict and the reasoning that produced it.
One number, built from the chart verdicts, that an attorney can defend and a client can understand.
Fine-tune the search strategy before it runs. Widen or narrow the scope, add or drop an aspect, course correct. It runs on your terms, not a fixed recipe.
Multiple AI agents cross-examine every claim chart and surface where they disagree. Nothing gets quietly resolved in the background. You see the disagreement and you make the call.
An AI assistant trained on your specific search and its output. Ask why a claim was charted the way it was, or what the search actually covered, and get an answer grounded in your report.
Edit any assumption or verdict after the run. Each one is marked AI-drafted or attorney-edited, so the file carries its own record of who decided what.
Inputs are never stored, are wiped after processing, and never train the model.
200M+ patents plus non-patent literature: journals, preprints, standards. 170+ jurisdictions, any language.
The multi-million-filing blind spot most searches skip. It decides the answer for anything made in or sold into China.
A standing, set-and-forget watch on a Counsel-Grade matter. It alerts you when a pending application grants, a blocker lapses, or a newly published patent lands in scope.
Enterprise white-labeling applies your firm's logo, brand colour, and typography across the team automatically, so the deliverable carries your name rather than ours.
You tune the search before it runs and you sign the opinion after. Evalify does the middle, and shows its work.
Drop in technical documents, draft claims, or a pitch deck, up to 20 files. No formatting work, nothing retained.
Evalify decomposes the invention into aspects and proposes a strategy. Fine-tune it, widen or narrow the scope, course correct, then approve it before anything runs.
It searches 200M+ patents and the literature and charts every claim, then multiple AI agents cross-examine the charts and surface where they disagree.
Ask the report's own AI assistant why it reached a verdict, edit anything you disagree with, and export under your brand. Every change is marked AI-drafted or attorney-edited.
How Evalify is redefining freedom-to-operate searches
| Feature | Manual search | Evalify |
|---|---|---|
| Time to complete | ✗10 to 20 hours | ✓About 15 minutes |
| Cost per matter | ✗Thousands of dollars | ✓< $500 |
| Coverage confidence | ✗Varies by individual searcher | ✓Stated coverage signal, plus agents cross-examining |
| Sources searched | ✗Patents and literature, coverage varies | ✓200M+ patents and literature, any language |
| Jurisdictions | ✗Limited by the hours available | ✓170+, including utility models |
| What lands on your desk | ✗Results to interpret | ✓Drafted opinion, claim charts, and a Score |
| Confidentiality | ✗Depends on the vendor's retention policy | ✓Input never stored, never trained on |
| Auditability | ✗Manual documentation | ✓Every change marked AI-drafted or attorney-edited |
Buy the report you need, when you need it. Global or IP5 is a scope toggle.
